HawaiianGuy

Champion Author
Idaho
Posts:9,509 Points:3,075,770 Joined:May 2003
|
Message Posted: Feb 13, 2013 10:22:31 AM
Necessity is the Mother of invention. At some point, though, pipelines will need to be built. All we're doing here is postponing the inevitable.
|
Amplion

Champion Author
Oregon
Posts:6,748 Points:1,861,325 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: Feb 12, 2013 2:32:49 AM
GOOD PLAN !!!
|
ExplorerWA

Champion Author
Washington
Posts:4,062 Points:794,225 Joined:Feb 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 10:36:21 PM
If this is the only way.......then do it.
|
sailorjupoak

Rookie Author
Fargo
Posts:77 Points:29,745 Joined:Dec 2012
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 9:27:15 PM
Almost every train I see here in ND has a few tanker cars full of oil. Get to is Wyoming!
|
must87searcher

Champion Author
Maryland
Posts:8,966 Points:1,776,755 Joined:Apr 2008
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 7:07:13 PM
With a route to ship the oil, railroad in this case, then it should be put into use. That way, there is no need too just keep on waiting and letting time fly by with the agruements of stalling of a pipeline.
|
weenerdog

Champion Author
Detroit
Posts:9,446 Points:1,881,965 Joined:Jan 2008
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 7:01:32 PM
go for it
|
tidalwave3

Champion Author
Tallahassee
Posts:1,294 Points:1,460,075 Joined:Jun 2008
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 6:35:27 PM
whatever it takes
|
MidNJ

Champion Author
New Jersey
Posts:7,536 Points:1,169,685 Joined:Sep 2009
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 5:46:14 PM
Lots of oil can be transported by rail, and there is no need to take additional land and incur construction costs for a pipeline.
|
MrBocho

Rookie Author
Los Angeles
Posts:39 Points:129,460 Joined:Oct 2012
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 5:33:34 PM
Yep
|
FortVancouver01

Champion Author
Washington
Posts:1,160 Points:284,495 Joined:Jul 2012
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 5:31:24 PM
A good alternative.
|
CCLighthouse

All-Star Author
Hartford
Posts:988 Points:210,005 Joined:Aug 2012
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 5:27:36 PM
It has to be cheaper to run the oil through pipes. No rail maintenance, etc.
|
The_DR

Champion Author
New Jersey
Posts:2,765 Points:581,165 Joined:Aug 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 5:25:44 PM
Fine by me
|
hcivic

Champion Author
Virginia
Posts:3,834 Points:2,261,715 Joined:Aug 2005
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 5:25:19 PM
good
|
ericbcire

Champion Author
Nevada
Posts:4,505 Points:1,263,710 Joined:Aug 2009
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 5:24:51 PM
Good for them.
|
Alaydown

Champion Author
Los Angeles
Posts:5,098 Points:820,470 Joined:May 2007
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 5:24:50 PM
When articles like this are posted, it becomes necessary to remind people of what is wrong with relying on rail for transporting oil. Rail is a fair short-term solution for transporting oil, but it should never be a long-term solution. Pipelines are the best method and should be the long-term solution. A network of pipelines already exist, and it is just a matter building other pipelines to connect to them.
The major reason opponents have against the Keystone XL is the potential for oil spills. But statistically, rail is a more dangerous method of transport for oil. It is also costlier and less efficient. Too much energy is used to move oil by rail compared to pipelines, and the higher cost is also passed on to the consumer. There is also the union factor which can hold us all hostage to their demands for transporting by rail, thereby driving up the cost of oil/gasoline while the rail unions go on strike.
America has 175,000 miles of onshore and offshore oil pipelines, and 321,000 miles of natural gas transmission and gathering pipelines. Gathering pipelines bring raw natural gas from the wellhead to the gas processing plant. In addition, there are more than 2 million miles of natural gas distribution pipelines sending gas to businesses and consumers.
About 71 percent of national crude oil and petroleum products are shipped by pipeline — 882 billion ton-miles in one recent year, according to the DOT. Tanker and barge traffic accounts for 22 percent, road accounts for 4 percent, and rail accounts for 3 percent.
Most applicable to this story, it should be especially noted that over a recent four-year period, rail had the HIGHEST rate of environmental incidents -- 651 per billion ton-miles per year. Incidents include not only explosions or fires but also the release of five gallons or more of a hazardous liquid.
Road had 20 reported incidents per billion ton-miles per year, while natural gas pipelines had only 0.89 incidents per billion ton-miles per year and oil pipelines had just 0.61.
Pipelines were also responsible for fewer fatalities and injuries — 2.4 fatalities and four injuries per year for oil lines, and one fatality and 6.2 injuries for gas lines. Road transport of oil and gas averaged 10.2 fatalities and 21.8 injuries per year, and rail averaged 2.4 deaths and 25.6 injuries.
It also should be noted that in December 2011, a national railroad strike was averted. It took more than a year to reach agreements with 12 of the 13 unions involved. The last union did not reach agreement until two months later. Warren Buffet's BNSF was one of the railroads it affected. Another potential strike sometime in the near future is certainly more likely with 40 percent of North Dakota's crude oil transport at risk from a strike as well as oil from states like Wyoming and others who are heavily relying on rail.
How many of anti-pipeline/pro-railroad people on this website will be whining about the spike in oil and gasoline prices when there is another threat of strike from the many railroad unions? After the next major rail incident that involves crude oil, will these same people also acknowledge that we should have built more pipelines instead of relying too much on rail? More than likely they will blame "Big Oil" and Republicans as usual instead of correctly placing the blame on striking unions and on those who held up approval of pipelines that could have prevented the price spike or environmental incident.
|
BossPal

All-Star Author
Illinois
Posts:527 Points:236,710 Joined:Mar 2012
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 5:24:28 PM
Ok
|
vrossi46

Champion Author
San Jose
Posts:2,657 Points:801,895 Joined:Oct 2008
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 5:23:47 PM
what ever works
|
g747

Champion Author
Mobile
Posts:4,521 Points:929,670 Joined:Jul 2009
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 5:23:28 PM
That should drive our prices down.Americans continue to conserve!!!!!!!!!.
|
Mr.Dirt

Champion Author
Albany
Posts:8,351 Points:2,508,625 Joined:Mar 2004
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 5:22:16 PM
what ever works do it
|
Paw5X

Champion Author
Gary
Posts:9,888 Points:2,264,505 Joined:May 2005
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 5:20:10 PM
Something needs to be done. Gas prices are alst $4.00 a gallon again!
|
racerdj

Champion Author
Indianapolis
Posts:9,800 Points:2,053,650 Joined:Jun 2003
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 5:19:14 PM
Approve the pipeline!
|
btex49

Champion Author
Austin
Posts:2,705 Points:528,155 Joined:Aug 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 5:16:33 PM
Long live trains!
|
FogCitySpotter

Champion Author
San Francisco
Posts:2,473 Points:519,250 Joined:Apr 2007
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 5:15:32 PM
There is a bit of irony to the story.
|
TheSnowstorm

Champion Author
Montreal
Posts:8,609 Points:1,910,980 Joined:June 2005
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 5:15:00 PM
There is no pleasing everyone. Pipelines leaking, train derailments. Maybe we should all just move into caves.
|
FortVancouver01

Champion Author
Washington
Posts:1,160 Points:284,495 Joined:Jul 2012
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 5:11:13 PM
Oil by steam...I love it.. :). Anyway developing alternatives is good for both countries and best for our collective national security.
|
bearzz

Champion Author
California
Posts:1,412 Points:415,670 Joined:Mar 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 5:11:01 PM
Hmmmm
|
OU8121959

Champion Author
Grand Rapids
Posts:2,698 Points:530,035 Joined:Apr 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 5:09:02 PM
okay
|
munch252

Veteran Author
Cleveland
Posts:282 Points:135,985 Joined:Aug 2012
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 5:06:32 PM
aye
|
fcdriver

Champion Author
Tennessee
Posts:7,228 Points:1,469,830 Joined:Sep 2008
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 5:03:22 PM
just keep it safe and efficient
|
PnnyPnchr

Champion Author
Toronto
Posts:16,568 Points:2,587,730 Joined:Dec 2002
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 4:59:47 PM
Great until there is a major railway accident. Then they will clamour for a pipeline.
|
DancingDee

Champion Author
Gary
Posts:4,375 Points:1,055,110 Joined:Jul 2005
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 4:59:27 PM
That's nice.
|
MaxGasUp

All-Star Author
Maryland
Posts:765 Points:226,665 Joined:Sep 2012
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 4:59:09 PM
Flexibility is good.
|
borodin

Veteran Author
Montreal
Posts:407 Points:32,635 Joined:Jan 2013
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 4:56:17 PM
Great
|
DirtDauber

Champion Author
San Antonio
Posts:6,766 Points:1,624,535 Joined:Nov 2005
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 4:53:31 PM
Distribution seems to be a major hindrance.
|
mikaye

Champion Author
Cleveland
Posts:3,814 Points:861,410 Joined:Jun 2010
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 4:52:41 PM
whatever works
|
cutter1330

Champion Author
Oklahoma
Posts:8,020 Points:1,690,440 Joined:Jul 2005
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 4:48:45 PM
Didn't know we had steam engines on the rails these days.
I thought pipelines had pumps, which use fuel or energy of of some kind.
No wait on my globe it looks like it might just run down hill!!
|
unloquacious

Champion Author
Indiana
Posts:2,668 Points:1,036,415 Joined:May 2005
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 4:48:02 PM
dozens of jobs = good.
|
mycar2

Champion Author
Akron
Posts:2,090 Points:2,354,115 Joined:Apr 2004
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 4:47:46 PM
just keep it safe,
|
Voltus

Champion Author
Miami
Posts:8,441 Points:1,553,350 Joined:May 2005
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 4:43:45 PM
oil-by-train gaining STUPIDITY nationwide... morons, pipelines are the way to go (trains burn fuel to transport fuel)
|
comprof

Champion Author
Houston
Posts:6,844 Points:1,353,825 Joined:Jul 2009
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 4:43:23 PM
And Soros gets his payback.
|
Kato51

Champion Author
Atlanta
Posts:7,245 Points:2,160,765 Joined:Jul 2005
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 4:42:49 PM
Looks like a sound decesion to me. Go WY.
|
fatboy97

Champion Author
Twin Cities
Posts:2,469 Points:1,704,550 Joined:Aug 2007
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 4:41:37 PM
A lot to say, and still not to the point in the first paragraph... when will these writers learn how to write???
|
3mta3

All-Star Author
Michigan
Posts:825 Points:1,000,790 Joined:Jul 2004
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 4:33:40 PM
This is safer/more economical than pipeline?
|
CPGas1815

Champion Author
Michigan
Posts:6,027 Points:1,099,605 Joined:Apr 2008
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 4:32:47 PM
Shipping oil via rail certainly does not make any sense.
|
DeHavilland

Champion Author
Toronto
Posts:5,855 Points:1,900,240 Joined:Jun 2007
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 4:31:54 PM
Whatever works.
|
Caribou2011

Champion Author
Ohio
Posts:3,746 Points:764,835 Joined:Feb 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 4:31:09 PM
Expect Obama to be against this unless it will create more government jobs.
|
tz2001

Veteran Author
Virginia
Posts:268 Points:318,805 Joined:Sep 2003
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 4:28:23 PM
Expect Obama's EPA to regulate the rail transport to the point of making it cost prohibitive. Libs hate fossil fuels.
|
BBHybrid

Champion Author
Pittsburgh
Posts:6,465 Points:1,294,070 Joined:Aug 2008
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 4:22:21 PM
keep our oil no exports
|
fire@53

Champion Author
Philadelphia
Posts:11,813 Points:2,766,050 Joined:May 2003
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 4:20:17 PM
If pipelines are not available why not using rail?
|
boldrph

Champion Author
Topeka
Posts:18,354 Points:3,447,640 Joined:Oct 2002
|
Message Posted: Feb 11, 2013 4:19:55 PM
rockefeller and vanderbilt would be so proud
|